. MARK: HELLO, AMERICA. I’M MARK LEVIN. THIS IS “LIFE, LIBERTY & LEVIN.” WELCOME.>>NICE TO SEE YOU.>>IT’S A GREAT HONOR TO SEE YOU, PATRICK MICHAELS. DOCTOR. EXPERT ON ALL THINGS CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENT AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED. LITTLE BIT OF YOUR BACKGROUND. DIRECTOR OF THE STUDY OF SCIENCE AT THE CATO INSTITUTE. YOU HOLD AN AB IN SM, YOU HOLD THOSE DEGREES IN BIOLOGY, SCIENCES AND PLANT ECOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO. PRETTY GOOD SCHOOL. Ph.D. IN ECOLOGICAL CLIMATOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN IN MADISON, 1979. PRESIDENT OF THE STATE CLIMATOLOGISTS, PROGRAM CHAIRMAN FOR THE CITY OF APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY OF THE AMERICAN METEORLOGICAL SOCIETY. SAY THAT FAST FIVE TIMES. RESEARCH PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOR 30 YEARS, AND GIVING EXPANSIVE BACKGROUND THAT YOU HAVE, GIVING THAT TO THE PUBLIC SO THEY THAT YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. YOU’RE A CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR AND REVIEWER OF THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL PANEL OF CLIMATE CHANGE. WE’VE HEARD IT ALL. WHAT’S GOING ON OUT THERE?>>WELL, SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE PLANET IS WARMER THAN IT WAS 100 YEARS AGO ABOUT. 9/10th OF A DEGREE CELSIUS. MARK: 9/10th DEGREE OF CELSIUS IS THAT A LOT?>>NO. COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY HUMAN BEINGS, WE HAVEN’T PUT ENOUGH CO2 IN THE AIR, AND ONE IN THE LATER PART OF THE 20th CENTURY THAT SLOWS DOWN OR DEPENDS WHOSE DATA YOU USE ONLY TO RESUME WITH THE BIG EL NINO THAT COVERED THE NEWS THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. THAT MEANS THAT PROBABLY HALF, MAYBE HALF OF THAT NINE-TENTHS OF THE DEGREE MIGHT BE CAUSED BY GREENHOUSE GASES. WHEN THE PLANET WARMED BEGINNING 1976, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE STRATOSPHERE STARTED TO STOP, THAT’S THE PREDICTION OF GREENHOUSE THEORY THAT’S NOT INTUITIVE. THE GREAT PHILOSOPHER OF SCIENCE CARL POPPER SAID IF YOU CAN MEET A DIFFICULT PREDICTION WITH YOUR THEORY, YOU CAN CONTINUE TO ENTERTAIN YOUR THEORY. SO THE THEORY IS RIGHT, BUT THE APPLICATION OF IT IS WRONG. IT IS NOWHERE NEAR AS WARM AS IT’S SUPPOSED TO BE. THE COMPUTER MODELS ARE MAKING SYSTEMATIC, DRAMATIC ERRORS OVER THE ENTIRE TROPICS WHICH IS 40% OF THE EARTH, AND IT’S WHERE ALL OUR MOISTURE COMES FROM. ALMOST ALL OF IT. MARK: LET ME STOP YOU THERE. WHO DOES THESE COMPUTER MODELS?>>GOVERNMENTS. THERE ARE 32 FAMILIES OF COMPUTER MODELS THAT ARE USED BY THE UNITED NATIONS. EACH GOVERNMENT SPONSORED. AND ALL OF THEM ARE PREDICTING FAR, FAR TOO MUCH WARMING. THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WHAT’S BEEN PREDICTED TO HAPPEN, WHICH LOOKS LIKE SDMSHGS WHAT IS HAPPENING CONTINUES TO GROW. MARK: WE KNOW THAT FOR A FACT?>>YEAH, YOU COULD JUST LOOK AT THE WEATHER BALLOON TEMPERATURES. YOU CAN LOOK AT THE SATELLITE TEMPERATURES. YOU CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING CALLED THE REANALYSIS DATA. THEY BEHAVE IN CONCERT. THEY’RE SHOWING THE SAME THING, AND THE SAME THING IS A LOT DIFFERENT THAN THIS THING. HOWEVER, WE NEED TO CALL THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. MARK: SPECIAL COUNSEL?>>YES, BECAUSE ONE MODEL WORKS. YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS? IT’S THE RUSSIAN MODEL. MARK: LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT. SO ALL THE GOVERNMENT MODELS ARE LIKE THIS?>>YEAH. MARK: THE RUSSIAN MODEL LIKE THIS.>>YEAH. THE RUSSIAN MODEL HAS THE LEAST WARMING IN IT. MARK: THE RUSSIAN MODEL HAS THE LEAST WARMING AND PRETTY MUCH FOLLOWS REALITY. WHAT’S BEEN TESTED OVER A FEW DECADES.>>YEAH, CORRECT. IF WE WERE RATIONAL ABOUT THIS, THINK ABOUT THE DAILY WEATHER FORECAST. YOU WATCH THE WEATHER CHANNEL, THEY GO THIS MODEL SAYS THAT, THAT MODEL SAYS THAT, WE THINK THIS ONE IS WORKING THE BEST, WE’RE GOING TO RELY ON THAT. WELL, FOR CLIMATE FORECAST SHOULD BE USING THE RUSSIAN MODEL BUT WE’RE NOT. WE USE THIS BIG SPATE OF ALL THE OTHER MODELS THAT HAVE THE WARMING THAT’S NOT OCCURRING. MARK: WHY ARE THE OTHER MODELS, 31 OF THEM, WRONG. AND WHY DO THEY ALL GO THE SAME DIRECTION, UP?>>BECAUSE, THEY WHAT ARE IS CALLED PARAMETERIZED. THEY’RE ALL PARAMETERIZED, CAN I TRANSLATE PARAMETERIZED IN ENGLISH? FUDGE. THEY DON’T GET THE RIGHT ANSWER, DON’T KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR CERTAIN PHENOMENA, SO WE ESSENTIALLY PUT IN CODE STEPS THAT GIVE US WHAT WE THINK IT SHOULD BE. AND SYSTEMATIC ERROR THAT WAS MADE WAS THE MODELS WERE TUNED, AS IT SAID. TUNED. TUNED TO SIMULATE THE WARMING OF THE EARLY 20th CENTURY. BEGAN IN 1910, ENDED IN 1945, ABOUT .45 DEGREES CELSIUS. MARK, THAT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CARBON DIOXIDE. MARK: BECAUSE THERE WASN’T ENOUGH.>>WE HAD TO PUT ENOUGH IN THAT THE BACKGROUND CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION IS 280 MILLION PARTS PER MILLION. WHEN THE FIRST WARMING STARTED, 208 PARTS PER MILLION. IF IT IS THAT SENSITIVE TO 18PPM CHANGE IN CO2 WE WOULDN’T BE TALKING ABOUT THIS RIGHT NOW AND WE’D BE SWEATING BULLETS.>>SO WHAT YOU’RE SAYING IS MAN MADE CARBON DIOXIDE THE LAST CENTURY COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED –>>EARLY 20th CENTURY. MARK: COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED THIS HEAT. SO WHAT DID? DO WE KNOW?>>NO. AND THREE MOST IMPORTANT WORDS IN LIFE MAY NOT BE I LOVE YOU. IT MAY BE I DON’T KNOW. I DON’T THINK ANYBODY REALLY KNOWS WHAT KICKED OFF THAT WARMING. THERE’S LOTS OF THEORIES. ONE IS THAT IT WAS THE FINAL ESCAPE FROM A GOLD PERIOD, MULTICENTURY PERIOD KNOWN AS THE LITTLE ICE AGE. THAT’S THE PLAUSIBILITY, WHY DID IT HAPPEN THEN. BUT WE DON’T HAVE A GOOD EXPLANATION FOR THAT. BECAUSE WE FORCED THE COMPUTER MODELS TO SAY, HUMAN INFLUENCE, CO2 AND OTHER STUFF. WE MADE THE MODELS TOO SENSITIVE, AND SO THAT’S WHY WHEN YOU GET TO THE LATE 20th CENTURY, ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY’RE WARMING UP LIKE CRAZY AND THE REALITY IS DOWN HERE. IT WAS GUARANTEED TO HAPPEN. THIS WAS REVEALED IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE IN LATE 2016, AND THERE WAS A PAPER PUBLISHED BY A FRENCH CLIMATE MODELER CALLED THE ART AND SCIENCE OF CLIMATE MODEL TUNING. AND IN IT, HE SPEAKS OF PARAMETERIZING. WE COULD SAY FUDGING, THE MODELS TO GIVE, HIS WORDS, AN ANTICIPATED ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF RESULTS. SO IT’S THE SCIENTIST, NOT THE SCIENCE THAT’S DETERMINING HOW MUCH IT’S GOING TO WARM. LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T KNOW THIS, BUT IT HAPPENS TO BE TRUE, AND YOU KNOW, WE COULD SPECULATE AS TO WHY THAT PAPER WAS PUBLISHED RIGHT BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTION? I WOULDN’T WANT TO IMPUTE CAUSATION, BUT GEE — MARK: BUT I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT CAUSATION.>>SURE. MARK: HAVE YOU 31 GOVERNMENTS.>>THE 31 DIFFERENT MODELS.>>31 DIFFERENT MODELS. MULTIPLE GOVERNMENTS.>>RIGHT. MARK: FUDGING THE NUMBERS?>>NOT FUDGING THEM PARAMETERIZING. MARK: YOU USED THE WORD FUDGING. DOES OUR EPA DO THAT? DOES NASA DO THAT? WHO DOES THAT FOR US?>>GOOD QUESTION, MARK, BECAUSE THE EPA WAS TOLD BY THE SUPREME COURT IN 2007 THAT IF IT FOUND THE CARBON DIOXIDE ENDANGERED HUMAN HEALTH AND WELFARE, THAT IT HAD THE POWER TO REGULATE IT UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT. MARK: THIS IS THE MASSACHUSETTS.>>THE EPA. WELL, THEY PRODUCED AN ENDANGERMENT FINDING, 2009, AND THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING FOR PROSPECTIVE CLIMATE IS 100%, I DIDN’T SAY 90%. I SAID 100% BASED ON THOSE MODELS. SO IF YOU CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT THOSE MODELS SYSTEMATICALLY ARE NOT WORKING, YOU CAN TAKE DOWN THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING, AND THAT WOULD BE THE BASIS FOR ALL THOSE POLICIES THAT CAME OUT OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. MARK: WHICH WOULD MEAN YOU DON’T GET TO REGULATE –>>ABSOLUTELY. MARK: — CARBON DIOXIDE.>>ABSOLUTELY, THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING IS THE HEART OF THE MATTER. TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA HOW GUNG HO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WAS ON THIS ISSUE. IF YOU LISTEN TO HIS FIRST INAUGURAL SPEECH, JANUARY 20, 2009, IT’S SECOND SUBSTANTIVE PARAGRAPH OF THE SPEECH IS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING, AFTER HEALTH CARE. 90 DAYS AFTER HE FINISHED THAT SPEECH, HIS EPA PRODUCED A PRELIMINARY FINDING OF ENDANGERMENT FROM CARBON DIOXIDE. THEY WERE WORKING ON THIS BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT, BUREAUCRATS CAN’T WORK THAT FAST, AND THEN THE FINAL FINDING WAS MADE IN DECEMBER FOR THE CLIMATE CONFERENCE IN COPENHAGEN THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO PRODUCE ANOTHER GLOBAL WARMING. MARK: SO YOU’RE TELLING US THAT WE HAVE A MASSIVE BIT OF PUBLIC POLICY THAT HAS ENORMOUS EFFECT ON SOCIETY THAT’S BUILT ON — I’LL USE MY WORDS, PHONY MODELS.>>BUILT ON A HOUSE OF CARDS. MODELS REALLY DON’T WORK. IF I COULD REALLY BE ARCANE, I COULD EXPLAIN THE MECHANISM AS TO WHY THEY DON’T WORK. MARK: AS LONG AS I UNDERSTAND IT.>>THE MODELS SYSTEMATICALLY PREDICT THAT AS YOU GO UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE IN THE TROPICS WHICH ARE 40% OF THE EARTH THAT THE TEMPERATURE SHOULD RISE DRAMATICALLY AS YOU GO FURTHER UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE. SO WHEN YOU GET TO THE LEVEL OF THE JET STREAM, THE COMPUTER MODELS ARE PREDICTING SEVEN TIMES. I DIDN’T SAY SEVEN-TENTHS OF A DEGREE, I SAID SEVEN TIMES MORE WARMING THAN BEING OBSERVED. WHY AM I BORING YOU WITH THAT? THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF TEMPERATURE DETERMINES PRECIPITATION, AND GUESS WHAT? ALMOST ALL THE ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE THAT WE HAVE AROUND US TODAY IN THE HUMID WASHINGTON, D.C., THAT COMES FROM THE TROPICS. SO IF YOU GET THAT VERTICAL MOTION WRONG, DOWN THERE, YOU GET ALL THE SUBSEQUENT VARIABLES WRONG. IT’S A FANTASTIC SYSTEMATIC ERROR, AND AGAIN, THAT ALONG WITH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SURFACE TEMPERATURES ARE RATHER THE LOWER ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURES THAN WHAT’S BEING OBSERVED, THAT’S SUFFICIENT TO THE CHEMICAL FINDING. MARK: TO THE AVERAGE PEDESTRIAN LIKE ME, IF YOU GET THAT WRONG, WHAT DOES IT MEAN? YOU GET THE WEATHER MODELS WRONG?>>THE SUBSEQUENT WEATHER WRONG. THAT’S WHY, IF YOU LOOK AT ALL THESE FAMILIES OF MODELS, THEY PREDICT RADICALLY DIFFERENT CHANGES IN PRECIPITATION FROM MODEL TO MODEL. WELL, PROBABLY BECAUSE THEY GOT THE PRECIPITATION INITIALIZATION OUT OF TROPICS WRONG. PRECIPITATION IS IMPORTANT. I OFFER YOU WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, IF AN EXAMPLE PRECIPITATION IS IMPORTANT COMING FROM THE TROPICS, GET THAT WRONG AND YOU GET THAT THING.>>IS WEATHER GETTING WORSE?>>NO. I LOVE THAT QUESTION BECAUSE WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT. ROGER PILKE, JR., AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DOES. THIS YES, THERE’S MORE DAMAGE FROM WEATHER BECAUSE THERE’S MORE STUFF AND PEOPLE AND PROPERTY IN THE WAY OF WEATHER. SO WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT ARE WEATHER DAMAGES AS A PERCENT OF GDP. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT THAT WAY, THERE’S NOTHING WHATSOEVER. I’M SURE HURRICANES ARE GETTING WORSE. I HEARD THAT ON EVERY LEGACY NETWORK DURING FLORENCE AND HARVEY AND ALL THAT STUFF. WELL, FACT OF THE MATTER IS, THERE’S A GUY BY THE NAME OF RYAN MAUI, A HOT SHOT YOUNG TROPICAL METEOROLOGIST, AND A SCHOLAR AT THE CATO INSTITUTE. HE TRACKS THE ENERGY IN THE TROPICAL CYCLONES. SINCE WE GOT GLOBAL RECORDS THAT BEGAN IN 1970, AND YOU WOULD THINK THERE WOULD BE SOME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THAT INTEGRATED ENERGY AND GLOBAL WARMING AFTER ALL, IT’S ONLY LOGICAL. VICE PRESIDENT GORE SAYS THAT MUST BE THE CASE. IT’S NOT. THERE’S NO RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER BETWEEN THE ACCUMULATED CYCLONE ENERGY AND THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH. IT’S JUST NOT THERE. NOW, WHAT — WAIT A MINUTE, J DOES OUR GOVERNMENT SAY THIS? THEY SAID IT IN THEIR LAST REPORT CALLED GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE UNITED STATES. THEY SAID, OH, THERE’S BEEN A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN HURRICANE POWER IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN FROM 1970 TO 2009 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. 1980 TO 2009. WAIT A MINUTE. WHY DID YOU STOP IN 2009. IT’S 2014 REPORT. BECAUSE IF YOU TAKE THE DATA AFTER 2009, THE INCREASE GOES BACK TO WHERE IT WAS. WHY DID YOU START IN THE MID 1970s, BECAUSE WE HAVE RECORDS THAT ARE REALLY GOOD BACK TO 1920. IF YOU LOOK AT 1920 TO 1950, YOU SEE AN INCREASE THAT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE ONE THAT OCCURS. MARK: SO THE INFORMATION THEY’RE PROVIDING US –>>IS SKEWED. IT’S SKEWED. THEY’RE CHERRY PICKING. MARK: HERE WE RELY ON THE CLIMATOLOGISTS AND THEY ARE HYPERPOLITICAL. TONIGHT GET BACK TO THAT AS SOON AS WE RETURN.>>>DON’T FORGET, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU CAN WATCH LEVIN TV ALMOST EVERY WEEK NIGHT BY

The truth about global warming
Tagged on:                                                         

100 thoughts on “The truth about global warming

  • September 25, 2019 at 12:48 pm
    Permalink

    Sounds right, a 4,000 year old culture has a more realistic model of the world than the obama administration.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 1:56 pm
    Permalink

    YouTube "Big Brother" must throw out the wikipedia article to push its agenda. Not a platform. A publisher. What a shame.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 3:14 pm
    Permalink

    Yeah, the Russians seem to be realistic and honest while Americans are not, we can see that by the left especially in the mainstream…complete propaganda.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 3:35 pm
    Permalink

    Would love to hear his comments on Greta.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 5:56 pm
    Permalink

    Read these "studies"… They're load with words such as "probably", "likely", "should", "might"… Studies make conclusions based on assumptions that cannot be replicated, and all use computer models based on that evidence that, again, cannot be replicated.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 7:32 pm
    Permalink

    Funny how nobody ever mentions rhythmic sun cycle outputs

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 7:51 pm
    Permalink

    Please Free Kashmir from India genocide72 years of genocide, rapes and nightly torture raids, thousand in prisons not to mention the Kashmir state being a 8 million open air prison with no food, no communications. No rights

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 8:03 pm
    Permalink

    Wikipedia is not a proper source of information since anyone can update it.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 8:24 pm
    Permalink

    It's all about control. Nothing about climate. Wake Up Earth!

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 9:01 pm
    Permalink

    Science has been hijacked long ago

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 9:28 pm
    Permalink

    Oh, but wait, should we believe this man, who has studied this topic all of his career, or a 16 year old girl who has Asbergers??? Mmmmmmmm- I think I will go with this gentleman!!

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 10:11 pm
    Permalink

    Its all about taxing your labor for the benefit of socialism. They know its a lie but they don't care. If they can terrorize a few children into believing this crap, that's all they care about. Everything with the left has to be a lie. No penalty for lying.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 10:21 pm
    Permalink

    Erm his example about the TV weather forecasters actually disproves his argument. Yes they may have some variation in their reports or chose for various sources, but GENERALLY you can trust the weather report. It's right a lot of the time. If you buy this guy's argument, then you can't pack an umbrella when it calls for rain. Have fun getting rained on.

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 11:40 pm
    Permalink

    I grew up in Montana but now I look out the Window and see Saguaro cactus. Is that because I moved to Phoenix?

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 11:42 pm
    Permalink

    I wonder what the reason is for us not having any snow in winter like we used to in the 90’s in Britain?

    Reply
  • September 25, 2019 at 11:44 pm
    Permalink

    You can’t get the radicals to believe science.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 1:08 am
    Permalink

    And that's why the buzz-term 'Global Warming' was discreetly changed to the more vague and nondescript 'Climate Change'.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 2:00 am
    Permalink

    So he means that more than 30 countries are knowingly using a model that is openly wrong, why there's no more alarm from the alternative scientist. He speaks more like a politician.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 3:12 am
    Permalink

    Please notice that the video begins with an excessive appeal to authority starting with his credentials. Oh how they try to make him sound worth listening to before he drops this bomb of nonsense: “probably about half, maybe half of that nine-tenths of the degree [of total warming] might be caused by greenhouse gases."

    Climate Feedback, a fact-checking website for media coverage on climate change, wrote of Michaels' assertion, "no evidence or research is provided to support this claim, which contradicts the published scientific literature."[15]

    No credentials in the world are worth anything if your just going to make stuff up like this guy.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 4:16 am
    Permalink

    Great vid…..you know it is time to commit to boycotting ANY product advertised proceeding or during videos on YouTube. You might be looking at something that is sensitive or means something and be blasted with some haphazardly placed pathetic crap product typically making consumers look like complete morons. Don’t buy these worthless products.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 4:49 am
    Permalink

    In the great Right Wing tradition of sheltering the Wealthy and the Powerful, lying is simply considered good strategy. Am I to believe that scientists and climate activists, all people with no money and no power, are "dictating" to our corporate-run and oligarch-beholden central government the FACT of increasingly runaway climate change — against the will of the billionaire elites who OWN Fox News and all the rest of the mainstream media? There is no way that that is true. This Doctor Contrarian to established science was lying a year ago when this video was made, and probably continues to lie. He's certainly paid well for doing so. The Republican heirarchy, along with the neo-liberal Democrat Party elites support the interests of the 10% of the People at most; that's the 1% and their bourgeoisie servants. Anyone from the Middle Class or lower should stop buying this elitist crapola dished out by the enemies of 90% of US.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 5:54 am
    Permalink

    Global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the elites to amass billions of dollars at the publics expense.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 8:32 am
    Permalink

    Fair and Balanced… LoL What a joke. I honestly feel bad for the people who let Fox inform their woldview.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 8:47 am
    Permalink

    Truth is toxic at Fox News. The word ab*rtion is not in the Bible. Neither is murd*r; so the opinion of creatures who prevent the conversion to non-lead ammunition and fishing tackle. Are dismissed out of hand as the rantings of a lunatic. There is no debate. AGW is here now.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 10:52 am
    Permalink

    Look at the growth im human population over the years. That give a direction correlation to so planet temperature raise.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 11:02 am
    Permalink

    Climate crisis is religion. Those who believe are steadfast in the conviction that someone else has to tell them what to believe. And any one who doesn't agree or asks for evidence, accuse them of being too stupid to understand.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 12:49 pm
    Permalink

    We are into a Earth cooling cycle and it’s natural for the Earth!

    Mini ice age in coming instead! CO2 level and temperature go up before this cycle!

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 1:46 pm
    Permalink

    I tried to share this on my Facebook page and got a warning saying THEY ( Facebook) had there own people look into it and claim this guy is not correct. They also threatened that they will further limit the sharing of his videos. Leftist information suppression overreach anyone?

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 2:56 pm
    Permalink

    Who killed the Wooly Mammoth, rhino, clovis people, dire wolfs, flat nose bears, and other mamals 10,000 years ago?  Was it cars. planes, and cows?   What about the orbit of earth around the sun!  Dumb hysterical Democrats!!

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 4:09 pm
    Permalink

    Maybe he should have a conversation with Bill Nye the science guy. Bill said the earth is almost on fire.. what a money grabbing bucket of crap!

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 4:53 pm
    Permalink

    so why is the ice caps melting so fast and not coming back?

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 4:57 pm
    Permalink

    yes we know that the climate changes I mean we see it in the earth, but whats going on in the us right now in the south ie the storms and flooding? I am done watching this guy in suit and snekers when he talks about Russia being the right modle….

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 5:05 pm
    Permalink

    the fact is that clean water is better for you then not clean water, also clean air is better for you.
    and last thing trees clean the co out of the air and make air so we can breath. I don't need anything to hear anything else about if its true or not about climate

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 5:07 pm
    Permalink

    so out of 32 models the only one is right is russias? wow now I beleave that …lmao
    you must know so much more then every one.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 5:25 pm
    Permalink

    pseudoscience = global warming scientists for whom are controlled by their government overlords

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 5:45 pm
    Permalink

    Global warming is NOT solely modeled by governments. There are also empirical, observational and computational research studies performed by research institutes and universities across the globe. So this gentlemen is cherry picking, a basic fallacy of research.
    My credibility? I'm a postdoctoral research fellow at a top level university; University of Chicago is not particularly special

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 7:21 pm
    Permalink

    I not sure about this guy; AOC really seems like she know what she’s talking about. Bartenders are really good at predicting climate change 🙄

    Climate change is the socialist Trojan Horse to regulate us into a 1-world government and take our freedoms away…

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 8:29 pm
    Permalink

    this guy has been discredited many times and he has freely admitted to getting almost half his funding from the fossil fuel industry.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 8:42 pm
    Permalink

    When you work for the government, you find what the government wants you to.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 8:47 pm
    Permalink

    You know one reason Global Warming is ssoo popular with certain people?
    Because, it's an Easy way for relatively selfish people who have generally done little to make a better world feel like they are "Little Messiahs"…
    That's right, with your "Donation" and your sacrifice to drive a Prius…You, yes YOU, can "SAVE" the World!

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 9:16 pm
    Permalink

    If the majority of models are all showing one result, and ONLY one shows something different, I would question the one that is different.That is rational! Russia has a government too after all.

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 9:32 pm
    Permalink

    come on lawyers with contacts, get this done. Do what you can!

    Reply
  • September 26, 2019 at 11:52 pm
    Permalink

    What kicked off the warming period was the Interglacial, what happens 'between' ice ages – duh… he should have known and said that.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 12:06 am
    Permalink

    Idiots! Those gases don't have one side that deflects while the other passes through. The theory has been proven wrong. It's not green house gases! If anything it would be the loss of vegetation being replaced by cement or other material that absorbs and stores energy.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 12:44 am
    Permalink

    "If you can meet the difficult prediction with your theory, then you can entertain your theory." Karl Popper via Dr. Michaels. Two questions:

    How many scientists are there with public voting records for Democrat, Green, Libertarian, Republican, etc. studying and publishing about this?

    How many are endorsed or sponsored by Left, Middle or Right entities?

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 1:50 am
    Permalink

    Still not afraid of 0.04 percent co2. Not even afraid of 0,2 percent co2.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 2:12 am
    Permalink

    Round of burgers please " " burgers all around ! "

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 2:23 am
    Permalink

    Fudged, cherry picked are a few interesting words…

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:19 am
    Permalink

    Please tell Greta before the kid is permanently damaged by her handlers.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:31 am
    Permalink

    The man looks like a heavy Lee Ioccoca. (RIP) CMJ

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:33 am
    Permalink

    CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT POLITICAL. Take the politics out and the answer is clear.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:49 am
    Permalink

    The global warming hoax will be used to legislate international blue laws. See/read, "The Great Controversy" by EGW. For reference.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:52 am
    Permalink

    Part of me hopes this is all real and we’re all gone in 20 years. We’ve gotten too stupid.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:58 am
    Permalink

    The fact is, when it comes to the climate, the only thing that has ever been a constant in the entire history of the planet is change.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 6:44 am
    Permalink

    We had a huge solar flair on November 4 2003 so big they said it was the biggest solar flair and temperatures went way up, they jumped on it and screamed global warming but no more mention of the gigantic flair. What about the aluminum sprayed in the sky almost everyday. They were making X’s in the sky today in my area. My aluminum pots and pans heat up real well. They bombard it with microwaves and heat everything up. It’s being created on purpose.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 8:08 am
    Permalink

    I enjoyed the piece but how do you explain the shrinking north and south poles,…more ice keekps falling into the ocean leaving polar bears adrift in little iglues. Am I missing something ? what is your take on that?

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 8:13 am
    Permalink

    Someone can you give me the link showing the importance of CO2 in the climate please ???

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 8:40 am
    Permalink

    2:55 – 32 families? im surprised he's still alive. search words: #1 grey and then #2 pope … you'll see what it means. All roads lead to…

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 9:29 am
    Permalink

    We just had a storm here in Houston (Sept.19), & the videos are showing hurricane footage from 2 years ago as if its now, LOL !
    They even gave the storm a name, "Emelda", but only hurricanes get names, LOL !
    We live here in Houston & we didn't know the storm was so bad til we saw the videos, LOL !
    Bogus global climate propaganda, Fake News, LOL !

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 10:47 am
    Permalink

    Great real estate opportunities for trump supporters: oceanfront properties available in California, Miami, and Greenland. Buy now, Start your exclusive (non-diverse) communities while the properties are still available

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 10:53 am
    Permalink

    Honest, smart Legend amongst cowards, thieves and do-gooders.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 11:29 am
    Permalink

    Why is it that I can no longer taste any salt in the ocean down my street? I am 67 years old and I see big changes in the world around me .Polishing my car has become a joke .

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 11:44 am
    Permalink

    Them sneakers tho

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 11:49 am
    Permalink

    Biggest threat to America and the world are democrats and their socialist lies

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 12:42 pm
    Permalink

    There are 3 TRILLION TONS of Carbon Monoxide held in stasis by the permafrost around the polar caps. Let me say that again 3 TRILLION TONS!!! That is 3,000,000,000,000 TONS of Carbon Monoxide underground around the polar caps. The ice is melting. You dumb fucks BETTER BE RIGHT!!!

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 1:33 pm
    Permalink

    Dr. rockin them New Balance sneakers with pride!

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 2:06 pm
    Permalink

    Switching from fossil fuels to renewable fuels offers a huge economic opportunity for the world. The US could be the leader and seize this opportunity. But we are sticking our heads in the sand, thanks to Fox News and others, and missing the opportunity. Dr. Patrick Michaels is a smart man. But smart men can be wrong, and the vast majority of the scientific community feels the SCIENCE AND DATA now piling up shows Dr. Michaels, while smart, is wrong. What would Levin and Fox News leadership need to see to change their minds on this issue and come to believe that dumping CO2 into the atmosphere is a problem? Hmmm…

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 2:47 pm
    Permalink

    i trust no one who wears new balances to an interview.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 3:56 pm
    Permalink

    Carbon emissions. Global Warming. Last winter we had temps of 60 below zero with wind chills of 100+ below zero in Continental U.S.

    What do Volcanos spew into the atmosphere each year? Anyone care to put a plug in a volcano's butt? Mother Earth will survive it all. If not, cockroaches will.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 4:49 pm
    Permalink

    20 of the last 22 years were the hottest in recorded history.  
     
    The last five years were the hottest in recorded history.  
     
    July was the hottest month in recorded history.  
     
    June was the hottest June in recorded history. 
     
    The oceans are the hottest in recorded history. 
     
    The temperature rise of 5-7 degrees in Alaska, northern Canada and the Arctic is unprecedented in recorded history. 
     
    The 2018 global heatwave spanning seventeen countries was the most extensive heat event in recorded history. 
     
    Record hot temperatures are now outpacing record cold temperatures by  a 2 to 1 margin, unprecedented in recorded history.

    SOURCES: NOAA, WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 4:52 pm
    Permalink

    I don't know if global warming is real or not but Al Gore says it is and he " invented the internet" sooooooooo,,,,,

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 4:58 pm
    Permalink

    Fine even Fox news is saying CO2 is causing warming. Lets stick with the precautionary principle.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 5:00 pm
    Permalink

    Best info ever

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 5:04 pm
    Permalink

    There are inherent unknowns in the models purely due to a lack of measurements. So for example you do not know the speed of ocean layer mixing – no one has the data – so you paramatise it.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 6:39 pm
    Permalink

    Global warming is global bullshheeet

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    Climate change there may be, but it is not man made. Global warming blaming people and fossil fuels are the plot of Communist China which loves fossil fuels.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 8:51 pm
    Permalink

    Every single time Fox says a word, it never has any relation to the main topic.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 10:47 pm
    Permalink

    I like the theory from Rust on true detectives. " stop reproducing and let humanity sail of into the sunset". Then the world still go on without us.

    Reply
  • September 27, 2019 at 11:15 pm
    Permalink

    Rhetorical question for ya: Why would an enormous news and entertainment company purposely put an obviously misleading title on this video? This nonsense is no closer to the truth about global warming then the back of a cereal box. Why don’t we dumb down our viewers even more!

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 12:00 am
    Permalink

    It's very simple. If the scientists can convince the public the sky is falling the more money they get. The more money the government can hide and play shell games with the more they can build there family fortunes. Just ask the Bidins.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 12:10 am
    Permalink

    There should be no debate here. Science is science. The effects of putting CO2 into the atmosphere have been known for a very long time.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:08 am
    Permalink

    Amazing sciences

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:18 am
    Permalink

    How hard did they have to look to find this guy? I'm thinking pretty hard.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:37 am
    Permalink

    The truth is, the model that makes corrupt Governments and the Corporations that run them the most money, is the model that makes sense to them! Things that don't make them money, "makes no sense at all!'

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:48 am
    Permalink

    Thank God for everyone who has both the brains and the guts to call bs when they see it – particularly when that bs is worldwide in scale and is, in reality, nothing but a OWO control & money-making SCAM! And as a woman w a STEM background, the faking of science and harsh manipulation of scientists lives/careers really gets my goat too.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:50 am
    Permalink

    Okay so let's just say we're not in the midst of a climate crisis in terms of warming. We're killing out species and habitats at an astronomical amount. I don't understand why there is ANY argument about putting the health of the earth as a first priority. What sort of neathrandal thinking is it that we care more about convenience than the state of the planet? How stupid do you have to be to ignore the simple fact that the earth has only so much space and so many habitats for us to take over and abuse?

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:54 am
    Permalink

    I am shocked and rather disappointed that this video has more than a 7:1 like/dislike ratio. Really, guys? Open your eyes, people.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 2:40 am
    Permalink

    Science has been clear for over 20 years. Other nations have already accepted what we're still arguing about. Watch 'Decoding the Weather Machine' on Netflix. And about Fox, check out the Media Bias Project on the web.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 2:49 am
    Permalink

    When posting a link to this video on Facebook, a message popped up claiming that the allegations made in this video have been debunked. I was given two options: "cancel" or "post it anyway". I chose the later.

    I can guarantee the allegations have been debunked by the same persons/organizations altering the figures.

    To date, in the more than eleven years I've been on Facebook, I've never experienced them attempting to discourage links to anything else. This was a first.

    And Facebook isn't alone in its attempt to shutdown criticism of the climate alarmists. YouTube now has Wikipedia disclaimers on all videos which are critical of man-made climate change.

    There are no such disclaimers on any other type of video, at least none that I've seen, and I peruse dozens of videos related to multiple subjects on a daily basis. There are not even disclaimers on videos uploaded by the consortium of tinfoil hat crazies. Every imaginable type of garbage is posted on YouTube, all without disclaimers. However, someone tries to expose evidence of tampering with climate records, and YouTube pulls out all the stops. And now, apparently, Facebook, too.

    And for those who doubt that there has been widespread tampering with the data, there are dozens of videos with hard evidence — actual printed, hard copy charts and newspaper articles from past several decades showing the manipulation of data and projections from year to year.

    They apparently don't want people seeing those, hence all the efforts to stifle the dissemination of such.

    I suppose, eventually, they will find a way to make those disappear, as well, much like the Ministry of Truth in Orwell's "Big Brother" erasing inconvenient and/or contradictory history from the official records.

    As I just posted two weeks ago, manipulation and misdirection of information is evil — and a core tactic of the Left. Orwell warned of them 70 years ago. Today, they do not even attempt to hide it.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 5:48 am
    Permalink

    Has anyone looked at the sky lately? Maybe there's a clue up there that all these 'experts' (and a majority of people) don't seem to see.
    Sure, beware of what governments and Greta want you to believe about the climate. But also beware of those who want you to believe there is nothing wrong with the weather.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 5:51 am
    Permalink

    Technology is such that currently it is possible to alter the weather patterns.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 7:36 am
    Permalink

    After watching what the climate alarmists have done to that little Swedish girl, Greta Thunberg there is no way in hell these people have anybody’s best interest in mind but their own.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 11:24 am
    Permalink

    If the weathermen can't get the weather right using the technology that they have and they can't even get it right for the next day, it stands to reason that the technology that is being used to to track or predict climate change isn't accurate either.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 11:36 am
    Permalink

    Partisan non-scientists, and irrelevant. It would be like consulting your grocer on your next heart surgery. Cato is propaganda mill for the GOP.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 11:37 am
    Permalink

    No such thing as global warming, ask our president lol

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 12:32 pm
    Permalink

    I rather have a warming planet than a cooling planet.

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 12:53 pm
    Permalink

    Do ya think it has to do with that “GREAT BIG BALL OF FIRE IN THE SKY?”

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 1:02 pm
    Permalink

    Remember the global warming people keep saying that seas are going to rise and cause massive flooding from the ice melting? Think about this. When you have a full, and I mean full glass of ice water, when the ice melts completely and you haven’t drank any of it, and yes, it is full up to the top, does your glass overflow???🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 3:00 pm
    Permalink

    Do people realize the CATO institute was founded by Charles Koch? This guy is literally paid by the Koch Bothers (well it's just one brother now)

    Reply
  • September 28, 2019 at 3:06 pm
    Permalink

    "Computer models" have never sat right with me. I think back to a computer tech who worked for my office, He said when it comes to computers "GIGO", meaning "garbage in garbage out". The ease in which computer models can be manipulated to bolster your narrative is used by the leftists to drum up support.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *