INTO THE POTENTIAL DANGERS OF THE PRACTICE OF FLARING, NATURAL THE PRACTICE OF FLARING, NATURAL GAS IN TEXAS. GAS IN TEXAS. WE BEGIN TONIGHT WITH THE WE BEGIN TONIGHT WITH THE BREAKING NEWS, THE TRUMP JUSTICE BREAKING NEWS, THE TRUMP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HEADED BY THE TRUMP DEPARTMENT HEADED BY THE TRUMP ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL, WILLIAM BARR, TOLD A FEDERAL COURT IN TOLD A FEDERAL COURT IN WASHINGTON TONIGHT THAT THE WASHINGTON TONIGHT THAT THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SHOULD HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SHOULD BE DENIED ANY ACCESS TO GRAND BE DENIED ANY ACCESS TO GRAND JURY MATERIAL FROM THE MUELLER JURY MATERIAL FROM THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION BECAUSE INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IMPEACHMENT IS NOT A JUDICIAL IMPEACHMENT IS NOT A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING ACCORDING TO THE PROCEEDING ACCORDING TO THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FILING IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FILING IN COURT NOTES THAT GRAND JURY COURT NOTES THAT GRAND JURY MATERIAL CAN BE RELEASED IN MATERIAL CAN BE RELEASED IN CONNECTION WITH A JUDICIAL CONNECTION WITH A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. PROCEEDING. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THEN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT THEN INSISTS, QUOTE, IMPEACHMENT INSISTS, QUOTE, IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS IN CONGRESS, PROCEEDINGS IN CONGRESS, INCLUDING HYPOTHETICAL REMOVAL INCLUDING HYPOTHETICAL REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE SENATE, ARE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SENATE, ARE NOT JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER NOT JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PLAIN AND ORDINARY MEANING THE PLAIN AND ORDINARY MEANING OF THAT TERM. OF THAT TERM. JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE LEGAL JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS ARE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS GOVERNED BY LAW THAT PROCEEDINGS GOVERNED BY LAW THAT TAKE PLACE IN A JUDICIAL FORM TAKE PLACE IN A JUDICIAL FORM BEFORE A JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE, BEFORE A JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE, PROCEEDINGS OUTSIDE THE JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OUTSIDE THE JUDICIAL SETTING ARE NOT JUDICIAL SETTING ARE NOT JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS EVEN IF THEY ARE PROCEEDINGS EVEN IF THEY ARE CALLED A TRIAL AND INCLUDE SOME CALLED A TRIAL AND INCLUDE SOME OF THE PROCEDURES FAMILIAR FROM OF THE PROCEDURES FAMILIAR FROM A COURTROOM SUCH AS SWORN A COURTROOM SUCH AS SWORN TESTIMONY OR LAWYER-LED TESTIMONY OR LAWYER-LED QUESTIONING OF WITNESSES. QUESTIONING OF WITNESSES. THE COMMITTEE FOR ITS PART THE COMMITTEE FOR ITS PART OFFERS NO EXPLANATION FOR HOW OFFERS NO EXPLANATION FOR HOW RULE REFERENCE TO JUDICIAL RULE REFERENCE TO JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AUTHORIZES PROCEEDINGS AUTHORIZES ADMINISTERED BY MEMBERS OF ADMINISTERED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. CONGRESS. YESTERDAY THE HOUSE JUDICIARY YESTERDAY THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ON A PARTY LINE VOTE COMMITTEE ON A PARTY LINE VOTE VOTED FOR A RESOLUTION FOR VOTED FOR A RESOLUTION FOR INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES OFFERED INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES OFFERED BY CHAIRMAN GERALD NADLER. BY CHAIRMAN GERALD NADLER. THAT RESOLUTION DESCRIBES IN THAT RESOLUTION DESCRIBES IN DETAIL THE PROCEDURES THE DETAIL THE PROCEDURES THE COMMITTEE WILL USE IN WHAT IT COMMITTEE WILL USE IN WHAT IT CALLS THE COMMITTEE’S CALLS THE COMMITTEE’S INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT WITH RESPECT TO IMPEACHMENT WITH RESPECT TO PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP. LEADING OUR DISCUSSION TONIGHT, LEADING OUR DISCUSSION TONIGHT, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, JERRY NADLER. COMMITTEE, JERRY NADLER. CHAIRMAN, THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN, THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SEEMS TO BE MAKING TWO CASES SEEMS TO BE MAKING TWO CASES HERE. HERE. FIRST OF ALL, THAT THIS IS NOT A FIRST OF ALL, THAT THIS IS NOT A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING IN YOUR JUDICIAL PROCEEDING IN YOUR COMMITTEE, THEREFORE, YOU DO COMMITTEE, THEREFORE, YOU DO HAVE A RIGHT TO THIS. HAVE A RIGHT TO THIS. SECOND, EVEN IF IT WAS A SECOND, EVEN IF IT WAS A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, INTERPRETED JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, INTERPRETED THAT WAY, YOU STILL DON’T HAVE A THAT WAY, YOU STILL DON’T HAVE A RIGHT TO IT, EVEN IF IT WENT TO RIGHT TO IT, EVEN IF IT WENT TO TRIAL, EVEN IF IT WENT TO A TRIAL, EVEN IF IT WENT TO A SENATE TRIAL, YOU DON’T HAVE SENATE TRIAL, YOU DON’T HAVE HAVE A RIGHT TO ANY OF THIS HAVE A RIGHT TO ANY OF THIS MATERIAL. MATERIAL. THEY’RE SAYING THAT YOU AREN’T THEY’RE SAYING THAT YOU AREN’T EVEN HAVING AN IMPEACHMENT EVEN HAVING AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, THERE ISN’T, THEY INVESTIGATION, THERE ISN’T, THEY INSIST, THERE IS NO IMPEACHMENT INSIST, THERE IS NO IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION IN THE HOUSE. INVESTIGATION IN THE HOUSE.>>WELL, LET ME DEAL WITH THAT>>WELL, LET ME DEAL WITH THAT IN REVERSE ORDER. IN REVERSE ORDER. WE’VE BEEN VERY CLEAR FOR THE WE’VE BEEN VERY CLEAR FOR THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS IN COURT LAST SEVERAL MONTHS IN COURT FILINGS, IN PUBLIC STATEMENTS, FILINGS, IN PUBLIC STATEMENTS, AND IN PROCEEDINGS IN THE AND IN PROCEEDINGS IN THE COMMITTEE THAT WE ARE, IN FACT, COMMITTEE THAT WE ARE, IN FACT, CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION, CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION, PREPARING TO DECIDE WHETHER TO PREPARING TO DECIDE WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE HOUSE. IMPEACHMENT TO THE HOUSE. NOW, YOU CAN CALL THAT AN NOW, YOU CAN CALL THAT AN IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, THOSE TERMS IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, THOSE TERMS HAVE NO LEGAL MEANING. HAVE NO LEGAL MEANING. BUT THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT WE’RE BUT THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT WE’RE DOING. DOING. WE’RE INVOLVED IN AN WE’RE INVOLVED IN AN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE HOUSE. IMPEACHMENT TO THE HOUSE. WE WILL DETERMINE THAT AT THE WE WILL DETERMINE THAT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS CONCLUSION OF THIS INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION. NOW, I KNOW THE REPUBLICANS AND NOW, I KNOW THE REPUBLICANS AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS ACTING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS ACTING AS AN ARM OF THE REPUBLICAN AS AN ARM OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. PARTY. MOST IMPEACHMENTS DONE SINCE THE MOST IMPEACHMENTS DONE SINCE THE REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1946 HAVE REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1946 HAVE BEGUN IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE BEGUN IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HAVE NOT HAD HOUSE HAVE NOT HAD HOUSE AUTHORIZATIONS AT ALL. AUTHORIZATIONS AT ALL. THE NIXON IMPEACHMENT HAD A THE NIXON IMPEACHMENT HAD A HOUSE OF AUTHORIZATION SIX HOUSE OF AUTHORIZATION SIX MONTHS AFTER THE INVESTIGATION MONTHS AFTER THE INVESTIGATION STARTED IN THE JUDICIARY STARTED IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, AND THAT WAS DONE AS COMMITTEE, AND THAT WAS DONE AS WAS THE CLINTON HOUSE WAS THE CLINTON HOUSE AUTHORIZATION IN ORDER TO GIVE AUTHORIZATION IN ORDER TO GIVE COMMITTEE THE RIGHT TO DO COMMITTEE THE RIGHT TO DO CERTAIN KINDS OF SUBPOENAS AND CERTAIN KINDS OF SUBPOENAS AND DEPOSITIONS. DEPOSITIONS. THE HOUSE RULES CHANGED, WE HAVE THE HOUSE RULES CHANGED, WE HAVE THAT AUTHORITY WITHOUT SPECIFIC THAT AUTHORITY WITHOUT SPECIFIC RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSE. RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSE. THERE’S NO QUESTION THAT WE ARE THERE’S NO QUESTION THAT WE ARE DOING AN INVESTIGATION TOWARD DOING AN INVESTIGATION TOWARD DETERMINING WHETHER TO RECOMMEND DETERMINING WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. THE SECOND ARGUMENT THEY MAKE IS THE SECOND ARGUMENT THEY MAKE IS THAT THAT DOESN’T QUALIFY AS A THAT THAT DOESN’T QUALIFY AS A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, THEREFORE, JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, THEREFORE, WE’RE NOT ENTITLED TO GRAND JURY WE’RE NOT ENTITLED TO GRAND JURY INFORMATION. INFORMATION. THIS IS ANOTHER INSTANCE OF THE THIS IS ANOTHER INSTANCE OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TRYING TO TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TRYING TO COVER UP AND HIDE FROM CONGRESS COVER UP AND HIDE FROM CONGRESS AND FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, IN AND FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, IN THIS CASE FROM CONGRESS BECAUSE THIS CASE FROM CONGRESS BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WOULDN’T THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WOULDN’T STEE GRAND JURY INFORMATION, ALL STEE GRAND JURY INFORMATION, ALL KINDS OF INFORMATION. KINDS OF INFORMATION. THE PRESIDENT SAID HE WOULD DEFY THE PRESIDENT SAID HE WOULD DEFY ALL SUBPOENAS, WHICH THEY HAVE ALL SUBPOENAS, WHICH THEY HAVE DONE. DONE. THAT WAS ARTICLE 3 OF THE NIXON THAT WAS ARTICLE 3 OF THE NIXON IMPEACHMENT TO FIND SUBPOENAS. IMPEACHMENT TO FIND SUBPOENAS. THE LAW SAYS THAT OOP UPON THE LAW SAYS THAT OOP UPON REQUEST BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE REQUEST BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, THE DEPARTMENT, THE IRS SHALL GIVE DEPARTMENT, THE IRS SHALL GIVE TAX RETURNS FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL. TAX RETURNS FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL. THEY HAVE REFUSED TO DO SO. THEY HAVE REFUSED TO DO SO. THEY HAVE SAID THEY HAVEN’T THEY HAVE SAID THEY HAVEN’T SHOWN ADEQUATE PURPOSE. SHOWN ADEQUATE PURPOSE. THAT’S NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS. THAT’S NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS. THEY’RE JUSTIFYING ALL THE LAW THEY’RE JUSTIFYING ALL THE LAW IN ORDER TO HIDE EVERYTHING FROM IN ORDER TO HIDE EVERYTHING FROM CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. PEOPLE. NOW, THEIR EXCUSE HERE THAT THIS NOW, THEIR EXCUSE HERE THAT THIS IS NOT A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, IS NOT A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING, THERE IS JUDICIAL PRECEDENT FOR THERE IS JUDICIAL PRECEDENT FOR CALLING FOR CONSIDERING CALLING FOR CONSIDERING IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING EITHER IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING EITHER JUDICIAL PROCEEDING OR JUDICIAL PROCEEDING OR PREPARATORY JUDICIAL PROCEEDING PREPARATORY JUDICIAL PROCEEDING BUT I’LL LET THE DETAILS GO TO BUT I’LL LET THE DETAILS GO TO THE LEGAL — TO THE REPLY BRIEF THE LEGAL — TO THE REPLY BRIEF THAT WILL BE FILED THIS WEEK. THAT WILL BE FILED THIS WEEK.>>IN THE NIXON CASE, IT WAS>>IN THE NIXON CASE, IT WAS ORDERED GRAND JURY MATERIALS ORDERED GRAND JURY MATERIALS HANDED TO YOUR COMMITTEE. HANDED TO YOUR COMMITTEE. THAT’S ONE OF THE PRECEDENTS THAT’S ONE OF THE PRECEDENTS YOU’RE REICHLYING ON. YOU’RE REICHLYING ON. THEY USE WHAT IN COURTROOM TERMS THEY USE WHAT IN COURTROOM TERMS WOULD BE CALLED EXTRAJUDICIAL WOULD BE CALLED EXTRAJUDICIAL COMMENT, MEANING THEY USE COMMENT, MEANING THEY USE STATEMENTS THAT SPEAKER PELOSI STATEMENTS THAT SPEAKER PELOSI HAS MADE WHEN TALKING TO HAS MADE WHEN TALKING TO REPORTERS OR TRYING TO EXPLAIN REPORTERS OR TRYING TO EXPLAIN SITUATION TO THE AMERICAN SITUATION TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. PUBLIC. THEY USE THAT IN THESE FILINGS THEY USE THAT IN THESE FILINGS TO SAY — TO TRY TO SAY THERE TO SAY — TO TRY TO SAY THERE ISN’T AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING ISN’T AN OFFICIAL PROCEEDING GOING ON. GOING ON. THEY SAY THE SPEAKER OF THE THEY SAY THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE SAYS IT IS NOT A TRUE HOUSE SAYS IT IS NOT A TRUE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING ON THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING ON THE SAME DAY THE HOUSE ADOPTED THE SAME DAY THE HOUSE ADOPTED THE RESOLUTION THAT THE COMMITTEE RESOLUTION THAT THE COMMITTEE CLAIMS AUTHORIZED THIS SUIT, THE CLAIMS AUTHORIZED THIS SUIT, THE SPEAKER TOLD A REPORTER THE SPEAKER TOLD A REPORTER THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS WAS NOT HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS WAS NOT EVEN CLOSE TO AN IMPEACHMENT EVEN CLOSE TO AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. INQUIRY.>>THAT WAS BACK IN JUNE.>>THAT WAS BACK IN JUNE. THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS THE HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS DOESN’T DO AN IMPEACHMENT DOESN’T DO AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. INQUIRY. SECOND OF ALL, THE SPEAKER HAS SECOND OF ALL, THE SPEAKER HAS BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE OF EVERY BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE OF EVERY STEP WE’VE TAKEN IN INITIATING STEP WE’VE TAKEN IN INITIATING THIS IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION. THIS IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION. EVERY CORRESPONDENTURT FILING, E EVERY CORRESPONDENTURT FILING, E STATEMENT, OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN STATEMENT, OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN THE COMMITTEE WAS OKAYED BY HER THE COMMITTEE WAS OKAYED BY HER AT THE TIME. AT THE TIME. THE HOUSE COUNSEL WHO PREPARES, THE HOUSE COUNSEL WHO PREPARES, MAKES ALL THE LEGAL FILINGS ON MAKES ALL THE LEGAL FILINGS ON BEHALF OF THE JUDICIARY BEHALF OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE SPEAKER, NOT TO THE CHAIRMAN OF SPEAKER, NOT TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. SHE’S BEEN FULLY SUPPORTIVE OF SHE’S BEEN FULLY SUPPORTIVE OF EVERY STATEMENT WE HAVE MADE AND EVERY STATEMENT WE HAVE MADE AND OF THE INITIATION. OF THE INITIATION. EVEN THE PROCEDURES THAT THE EVEN THE PROCEDURES THAT THE COMMITTEE VOTED, WHICH INCLUDED COMMITTEE VOTED, WHICH INCLUDED IN THE PREAMBLE A HISTORY OF HOW IN THE PREAMBLE A HISTORY OF HOW THIS INVESTIGATION STARTED, AND THIS INVESTIGATION STARTED, AND OF THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE OF THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE HOUSE BACK IN JUNE AUTHORIZING HOUSE BACK IN JUNE AUTHORIZING SUBPOENAS AND OTHER THINGS, AND SUBPOENAS AND OTHER THINGS, AND THE ACCOMPANYING REPORT WHICH THE ACCOMPANYING REPORT WHICH SAYS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, IN SAYS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE HOUSE, ALL OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE HOUSE, ALL OF THAT WAS DONE WITH THE SPEAKER’S THAT WAS DONE WITH THE SPEAKER’S APPROVAL AND DIRECT INVOLVEMENT. APPROVAL AND DIRECT INVOLVEMENT.>>THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FILING>>THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FILING SAYS THAT THE COMMITTEE DOES NOT SAYS THAT THE COMMITTEE DOES NOT KNOW WHETHER IT’S GOING TO HAVE KNOW WHETHER IT’S GOING TO HAVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OR VOTE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OR VOTE ON ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OF ON ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT OF THE PRESIDENT. THE PRESIDENT. THE COMMITTEE MIGHT END UP WITH THE COMMITTEE MIGHT END UP WITH JUST A CENSURE OR NOT TAKE JUST A CENSURE OR NOT TAKE ACTION. ACTION.>>THAT’S LIKE SAYING YOU>>THAT’S LIKE SAYING YOU SHOULDN’T SHOW EVIDENCE TO THE SHOULDN’T SHOW EVIDENCE TO THE JURY BECAUSE THE JURY HASN’T JURY BECAUSE THE JURY HASN’T MADE UP ITS MIND AT THE MADE UP ITS MIND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TRIAL. BEGINNING OF THE TRIAL. OF COURSE WE HAVEN’T DETERMINED OF COURSE WE HAVEN’T DETERMINED YET WHETHER TO RECOMMEND YET WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. THAT’S WHY WE’RE HAVING THIS THAT’S WHY WE’RE HAVING THIS INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS SUFFICIENT AND IMPORTANT ENOUGH SUFFICIENT AND IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY THE RATHER TO JUSTIFY THE RATHER EXTRAORDINARY STEP OF VOTING EXTRAORDINARY STEP OF VOTING ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. ONE CAN HAVE ONE’S PERSONAL ONE CAN HAVE ONE’S PERSONAL OPINIONS AS TO THE QUALITY OF OPINIONS AS TO THE QUALITY OF THAT EVIDENCE, BUT YOU DON’T THAT EVIDENCE, BUT YOU DON’T ANNOUNCE THE CONCLUSION AT THE ANNOUNCE THE CONCLUSION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TRIAL OR BEGINNING OF THE TRIAL OR PROCEEDING. PROCEEDING.>>ATHE JUDGE ORDERED THE GRAND>>ATHE JUDGE ORDERED THE GRAND JURY MATERIAL HANDED OVER TO THE JURY MATERIAL HANDED OVER TO THE COMMITTEE BEFORE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE BEFORE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE DECIDED THAT IT WAS COMMITTEE DECIDED THAT IT WAS GOING TO VOTE ON ARTICLES OF GOING TO VOTE ON ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. AND ALSO THE COMMITTEE DIDN’T AND ALSO THE COMMITTEE DIDN’T NECESSARILY KNOW WHETHER THE NECESSARILY KNOW WHETHER THE VOTE ON ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT VOTE ON ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT WOULD PASS. WOULD PASS.>>OF COURSE NOT.>>OF COURSE NOT. A PROPER INVESTIGATION, A PROPER A PROPER INVESTIGATION, A PROPER PROCEEDING TO DETERMINE WHETHER PROCEEDING TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF TO RECOMMEND ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, WHETHER BY THE IMPEACHMENT, WHETHER BY THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN 1973 AND JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IN 1973 AND 74 WITH RESPECT TO NIXON OR NOW, 74 WITH RESPECT TO NIXON OR NOW, YOU DON’T START OFF WITH A YOU DON’T START OFF WITH A CONCLUSION. CONCLUSION. YOU MAY HAVE PERSONAL OPINIONS. YOU MAY HAVE PERSONAL OPINIONS. BUT YOU DON’T START OF WITH AN BUT YOU DON’T START OF WITH AN OFFICIAL CONCLUSION. OFFICIAL CONCLUSION. YOU EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE AND YOU YOU EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE AND YOU MAKE A CONCLUSION. MAKE A CONCLUSION. NOW, I THINK PERSONALLY THE NOW, I THINK PERSONALLY THE EVIDENCE IS VERY STRONG, BUT EVIDENCE IS VERY STRONG, BUT THAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION AT THAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION AT THE MOMENT. THE MOMENT. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A VERY WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A VERY AGGRESSIVE SERIES OF HEARINGS AGGRESSIVE SERIES OF HEARINGS STARTING NEXT TUESDAY TO BRING STARTING NEXT TUESDAY TO BRING OUT THE WITNESSES. OUT THE WITNESSES. AND WE’RE GOING TO GO WELL AND WE’RE GOING TO GO WELL BEYOND THE PARAMETERS OF THE BEYOND THE PARAMETERS OF THE MUELLER REPORT. MUELLER REPORT. IT’S NOT JUST THE QUESTION OF IT’S NOT JUST THE QUESTION OF COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS IN COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS IN THE ELECTION AND THE QUESTION OF THE ELECTION AND THE QUESTION OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, WHICH I OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, WHICH I THINK IS VERY CLEARLY INDICATED THINK IS VERY CLEARLY INDICATED IN THE MUELLER REPORT. IN THE MUELLER REPORT. BUT THE QUESTION OF SELF-DEALING BUT THE QUESTION OF SELF-DEALING AND SELF-ENRICHMENT THAT AND SELF-ENRICHMENT THAT AMERICAN TAXPAYER MONEY IS GOING AMERICAN TAXPAYER MONEY IS GOING DIRECTLY TO THE POCKET OF THE DIRECTLY TO THE POCKET OF THE PRESIDENT THAT APPARENTLY SAUDI PRESIDENT THAT APPARENTLY SAUDI MONEY IS GOING DIRECTLY TO THE MONEY IS GOING DIRECTLY TO THE POCKETS OF THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE POCKETS OF THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE ALL OF THIS IN DIRECTION ALL OF THIS IN DIRECTION VIOLATION OF THE EMOLUMENTS VIOLATION OF THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION BECAUSE OF THE VERY CORRUPT BECAUSE OF THE VERY CORRUPT ACTIONS WHERE YOU DIRECT THE AIR ACTIONS WHERE YOU DIRECT THE AIR FORCE TO USE THE TRUMP HOTEL OR FORCE TO USE THE TRUMP HOTEL OR FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS SEEKING TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS SEEKING TO INFLUENCE UNITED STATES INFLUENCE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT HAVE THEIR GOVERNMENT HAVE THEIR DELEGATIONS STAY AT TRUMP DELEGATIONS STAY AT TRUMP HOTELS, WHICH HE HASN’T DIVESTED HOTELS, WHICH HE HASN’T DIVESTED HIMSELF OF AN INTERESTED IN, HIMSELF OF AN INTERESTED IN, WHICH MEANS MONEY DIRECTLY INTO WHICH MEANS MONEY DIRECTLY INTO HIS POCKET. HIS POCKET. WE HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT HIS WE HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT HIS FAILURE TO DEFEND. FAILURE TO DEFEND. I MEAN THERE’S PLENTY OF I MEAN THERE’S PLENTY OF EVIDENCE THAT MUELLER TESTIFIED EVIDENCE THAT MUELLER TESTIFIED TO THIS, SENATOR COATES, FORMER TO THIS, SENATOR COATES, FORMER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, THAT WE’RE UNDER INTELLIGENCE, THAT WE’RE UNDER ATTACK NOW IN TERMS OF OUR ATTACK NOW IN TERMS OF OUR ELECTION AND THEY EXPECT THEM TO ELECTION AND THEY EXPECT THEM TO INTERVENE NEXT YEAR. INTERVENE NEXT YEAR. HAD THE PRESIDENT DONE ANYTHING HAD THE PRESIDENT DONE ANYTHING TO CARRY OUT HIS OATH TO PROTECT TO CARRY OUT HIS OATH TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, TO AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, TO SEE THAT THE LAWS AGAINST SEE THAT THE LAWS AGAINST ELECTION INTERFERENCE ARE ELECTION INTERFERENCE ARE PROTECTED? PROTECTED? THE FACT THAT HE HAS DEFIED ALL THE FACT THAT HE HAS DEFIED ALL CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS IS AN CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS IS AN OBSTRUCTION OF THE WORK OF OBSTRUCTION OF THE WORK OF AGGRESSION. AGGRESSION. THE CENTRAL PURPOSE OF THE CENTRAL PURPOSE OF IMPEACHMENT IS NOT TO PUNISH IMPEACHMENT IS NOT TO PUNISH CRIMES. CRIMES. THE CENTRAL PURPOSE AS DESCRIBED THE CENTRAL PURPOSE AS DESCRIBED BY THE FEDERALIST PAPERS ET BY THE FEDERALIST PAPERS ET CETERA IS TO PREVENTIVE CETERA IS TO PREVENTIVE AGGRANDIZEMENT OF POWER BY THE AGGRANDIZEMENT OF POWER BY THE PRESIDENT, TO PROTECT LIBERTY, PRESIDENT, TO PROTECT LIBERTY, THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, TO THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, TO PREVENT THE PRESIDENT FROM PREVENT THE PRESIDENT FROM ASSUMING POWER OVER THE CONGRESS ASSUMING POWER OVER THE CONGRESS AND OVER THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. AND OVER THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. HIS COMPLETE SUBVERSION OF THIS HIS COMPLETE SUBVERSION OF THIS BY REFUSING ALL INFORMATION TO BY REFUSING ALL INFORMATION TO CONGRESS AND EVEN THIS BRIEF CONGRESS AND EVEN THIS BRIEF COULD BE READ AS PART OF THAT, COULD BE READ AS PART OF THAT, THAT WAS ARTICLE 3 IN THE NIXON THAT WAS ARTICLE 3 IN THE NIXON IMPEACHMENT, AND NIXON DIDN’T GO IMPEACHMENT, AND NIXON DIDN’T GO SO FAR AS TO SAY HE WOULD OPPOSE SO FAR AS TO SAY HE WOULD OPPOSE ALL SUBPOENAS AS THIS PRESIDENT ALL SUBPOENAS AS THIS PRESIDENT HAS SAID HE WOULD DO AND HAS HAS SAID HE WOULD DO AND HAS DONE. DONE. I THINK THERE’S VERY, VERY I THINK THERE’S VERY, VERY SERIOUS REASONS. SERIOUS REASONS. SOME PEOPLE SAY, BY THE WAY, WHY SOME PEOPLE SAY, BY THE WAY, WHY SHOULD WE IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT, SHOULD WE IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT, THE SENATE WOULD NEVER CONVICT THE SENATE WOULD NEVER CONVICT ANYWAY. ANYWAY. I THINK IT’S VERY IMPORTANT THAT I THINK IT’S VERY IMPORTANT THAT THIS KIND OF CONDUCT, IF YOU CAN THIS KIND OF CONDUCT, IF YOU CAN PROVE IT, BE CALLED OUT, THAT PROVE IT, BE CALLED OUT, THAT THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE VINDICATED, AND THAT A VINDICATED, AND THAT A PRESIDENT — AND THE NEXT PRESIDENT — AND THE NEXT PRESIDENT AND THE ONE AFTER HIM PRESIDENT AND THE ONE AFTER HIM OR HER HAS TO KNOW YOU CAN’T DO OR HER HAS TO KNOW YOU CAN’T DO THIS SORT OF THING. THIS SORT OF THING. YOU HAVE TO PROTECT THE YOU HAVE TO PROTECT THE INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT SO INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT SO THAT POWERS AREN’T CENTRALIZED THAT POWERS AREN’T CENTRALIZED SO YOU DON’T GET TO A SO YOU DON’T GET TO A DICTATORSHIP. DICTATORSHIP.>>IS STORMY DANIELS GOING TO BE>>IS STORMY DANIELS GOING TO BE A WITNESS IN FRONT OF YOUR A WITNESS IN FRONT OF YOUR COMMITTEE? COMMITTEE?>>I DON’T KNOW SHE WILL BE, BUT>>I DON’T KNOW SHE WILL BE, BUT THE MISUSE OR THE PAYMENTS TO THE MISUSE OR THE PAYMENTS TO THE WOMEN, TO STORMY DANIELS AND THE WOMEN, TO STORMY DANIELS AND FORGET THE NAME OF THE OTHER FORGET THE NAME OF THE OTHER WOMAN, TO PREVENT THAT WOMAN, TO PREVENT THAT INFORMATION FROM COMING OUT IN INFORMATION FROM COMING OUT IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE ELECTION IS

“No Question: We’re In Investigation To Determine Articles Of Impeachment | The Last Word | MSNBC

100 thoughts on ““No Question: We’re In Investigation To Determine Articles Of Impeachment | The Last Word | MSNBC

  • September 15, 2019 at 6:04 pm
    Permalink

    For God's sake stop wasting taxpayers money a Blind dumb person can see the trump administration needs to be impeached and jailed for life

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:08 pm
    Permalink

    How can anyone not know that donald trump is a criminal and needs to be Impeached??

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:13 pm
    Permalink

    I listen to Nadler and I want to pull my hair out!!!

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:21 pm
    Permalink

    What’s killing me is how long this is taking. You’re stupid if you don’t think everything in his taxes, or history of finances every seven years, statute of limitations; three so far, no longer available for investigation. Impeach the POS already.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:36 pm
    Permalink

    In the real world of real democracy politicians are hired by voters to do a J O B. In the fantasy world of the obsessive compulsive fart knock fairy, politicians are selected virtue performance artists, conducting a righteous virtue war upon the lower classes. Horrific stinking to high heaven DNC dinner theater yes

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:40 pm
    Permalink

    Pelosi needs to explain her bartab.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:41 pm
    Permalink

    What is it that they really need to investigate?!? I can name 5 things trump did off the top of my head that I would be in prison for already. 🤦🏽‍♂️

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:45 pm
    Permalink

    Stawmy Daniels—lol

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 6:52 pm
    Permalink

    Threaten Attorney General Bill Barr with a charge of Obstruction of Justice upon election of the next Democratic President.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:06 pm
    Permalink

    The day Nadler stops talking and impeachment starts then I will take notice of him. Talks cheep Nadler , three years of it .

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:11 pm
    Permalink

    The Speaker NEVER should have been put int hat position and just HOW MANY INVESTIGATIONS does there have to be?? VOTE RED FELLOW SENIORS and put an end to Pelosi madness. She is NOT doing the bidding of the majority of the people.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:13 pm
    Permalink

    Looking back at President Obama’s legacy, the Council on Foreign Relation’s Micah Zenko added up the defense department’s data on airstrikes and made a startling revelation: in 2016 alone, the Obama administration dropped at least 26,171 bombs. This means that every day last year, the US military blasted combatants or civilians overseas with 72 bombs; that’s three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day.

    Isn't that considered war crimes?

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:14 pm
    Permalink

    I’ll bet that bill barr spends a good portion of his time trying to find loopholes to keep consequences at bay from Trump.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:16 pm
    Permalink

    Can a Judicial Process be Sealed? Does the Acuser have access to the results of a SEALED COURT CASE?

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:23 pm
    Permalink

    NADLER IS FULL OF CRAP

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:23 pm
    Permalink

    LAWRENCE O'DONNELL IS FULL OF CRAP

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:29 pm
    Permalink

    Hate is pure EVIL.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:46 pm
    Permalink

    when the fascist spasm of "Trumpism" bursts like a festering boil, his hatemongers will shrink back into the shadows of shame, & like an orwellian psycho-fable, the King Leech & his co-conspirators will be hung out to disgorge their ill-gotten gains & (#RICO) mobsterism 💩 #Trumphole 💀 ☠ The #Trump™ Organization ☣ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trump_Organization

    Trump-ocalyp$e Exposed: ☠ https://youtu.be/L3Y_-mMGLB8?list=PLfRHLmFaPjT0lB_X5cF4ij5icpywb6qvg

    ☣ ☠ "Anyone who was anyone in the #Russian mob had money-laundering offices at #TrumpTower": Feature documentary "Active Measures" https://www.activemeasures.com/

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:49 pm
    Permalink

    At this point Nadler sounds like a broken record. If impeachment was up for a vote today, many democrats would vote against it.

    Just to show how hopeless this is 100 house democrats don’t even support an impeachment inquiry. This is not even impeachment: it’s an investigation to determine whether the house should go ahead with impeachment proceedings : and 100 house dems aren’t on board with it.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:49 pm
    Permalink

    I propose the Laws are updated to protect the Senior Citizens dealing with Mental Health issues.
    For example: Psychoanalytic Institute does not require Board Certification to practice. In other words a "Psychoanalyst" can practice if they pass a question and answer test. These are LICENSED practitioners. Board Certified means that they have finished their personal Psychoanalysis. In other words…they have proven themselves to be SANE and indicates they will not bend the rules for personal gratification.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:51 pm
    Permalink

    heaven forbid that little fat nadler should be able to change the law to suit his silly appetite for an illegal procedure!! what a friggin' joke..

    oh i love it.. they used to love barr and now "he's the arm of the exec branch".. pick your poison nadler… you're a clown and should drive out of dc in a clown car!!!

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 7:52 pm
    Permalink

    Jerry Nadler is using his powerful position for political reasons. He is attempting to subvert the election process. He is trying to either oust an elected President, or prevent his re-election by digging for dirt. His as actions suggest to many that the President has broken important laws. His actions don't prove a thing. Nadler would like proof, but he's also satisfied with just being seen doing investigation. It successfully smears the President without the need for pesky proof.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:06 pm
    Permalink

    Does the public understand the difference between BOARD CERTIFIED and LICENSED? NO. I did not!
    I cannot say, loud enough, what damage my LICENSED PSYCHOANALYST caused me. Loss of my (then, million $ waterfront home, loss of identity via brainwashing over the internet, nervous breakdown, compound PTSD, loss of ALL assets.
    The Psychoanalytic Institute blew me off upon my complaint about one of their Instructors. Moreover, I fixed my mental breakdown via YouTube. Can the Institute of Psychoanalysis Cure patients? Based on my experience, SADLY NOT.
    [email protected]
    I tried more than 9 years of formal analysis 4 days a week in my 20s. People CAN CURE themselves. It just takes a lot of work and experience. The Psychoanalytic Institute must update their practices and their Policies. [email protected]

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:11 pm
    Permalink

    All Psychoanalysts are (state) licensed but not All
    are BOARD CERTIFIED.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:30 pm
    Permalink

    Just because you little boys and girls want an investigation to fill your little Minds with hate doesn't mean you can have it..🤣🙈
    Attorney general Barr going by the law that's why you people should be afraid very afraid..

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:33 pm
    Permalink

    Bill Clinton was impeached for having sexual relations with a White House intern.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:40 pm
    Permalink

    Nancy Pelosi, who is Speaker of the House, beckons Trump with money ( a thing that Trump loves) and the billions and billions of dollars that Trump wasted.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:42 pm
    Permalink

    Why does it seem that the impeachment is being “ slow walked” ?

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 8:53 pm
    Permalink

    The Department of Justice has become a toilet smeared with a huge steaming Barr!

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 9:07 pm
    Permalink

    It is apparent that citizens must go out of their way to protect those who are risking everything to defend democracy.
    That means you and that means right now.
    This is not a video game.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 9:25 pm
    Permalink

    Barr did admit to Trumps impeachable offenses

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 9:45 pm
    Permalink

    I apologize for intruding here, but no one is dealing with INTERNET ABUSES! This dangerous because few mental health professionals are qualified these days to use good judgment. What has happened to the entire field of practitioners? I saw a Cognitive Therapist last year who was BARELY qualified to conduct an intake. Make stringent laws to make it ILLEGAL to treat people over the Internet. Jail them! It must become a LAW by 2020.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 10:12 pm
    Permalink

    Cannot imagine what more evidence the Judiciary Committee is waiting for beyond what Mueller already uncovered. Of course there are more impeachable crimes to uncover but it will make no difference in a year when he's gone. Then they can say "Aw geez, and we had so much evidence…" Maybe they just don't have the guts.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 10:14 pm
    Permalink

    How much More INVESTIGATING CAN ONE GOVERNMENT DO ⁉️

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 10:16 pm
    Permalink

    TRUMP LUCKY ENOUGH TO HAVE A LOTS SHIELD PUPPETS AROUND TO PROTECT HIM..HE HAVE AG BARR, HE HAVE DOJ, HE HAVE FBI, HE HAVE DOT MNUCHIN, HE HAVE CHIEF OF STAFF, HE HAVE MCCONNELL MITCH MOSCOW AND HIS WIFE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, HE HAVE LINDSEY GRAHAM, POMPEO, HE HAVE NRA ORGANIZATIONS, HE HAVE REPUBLICANS MEMBERS ON THE HILL….SO WHAT CAN CONGRESS DO TO PROTECT OUR COUNTRY, OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR PEOPLE ? NOT A LOTS ….ONLY ONE THING THE AMERICANS PEOPLE CAN DO ..IS GO ALL OUT TO “ VOTE TRUMP OUT OF THE OFFICE, PERIOD “ .

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 10:21 pm
    Permalink

    "And if you defy the subpoena, & don't turn over the documents, we will give you 3 more weeks.
    And if you still fail to turn over the documents, we will double your punishment, & give you 6 more weeks."

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 10:46 pm
    Permalink

    I swear I would die before I ever vote Democrat the blatant lies are absurd

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 10:48 pm
    Permalink

    I’m sorry they are opening an investigation in whether to proceed with articles of impeachment, which begins with an investigation. So they are investigating to whether they should investigate……god I hate the way the Dems in power have been handling this crap. They kept claiming impeachment is unpopular therefore shouldn’t be done but Nixon’s had 30% support and that shot up as the investigation went on and before the vote by Hour or Senate more than a majority of the country was in favour. The Clinton case didn’t go that way because the Republicans were basing it on nothingness, it was initially on a real estate deal but ended up being filed against lying about infidelity.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 11:01 pm
    Permalink

    let's move on from this impeachment b***** the Democrats have been crying wolf for over a year. they made themselves look stupid they made people like me who watch the news every night talkin about all the laws this guy has broken yet no one does anything. bar was right to say none of the Democrats are on the same page or saying the same thing. I would not mind if we did away with the Congress and Senate because they do not seem to be working at all

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 11:22 pm
    Permalink

    Fake! There will be no impeachment. They just want to garner votes for the upcoming election. Of course since Trump will win again they scream and kick even more. Why can't some people just grow up

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 11:43 pm
    Permalink

    Time to get rid of Nancy Pelosi.

    Reply
  • September 15, 2019 at 11:54 pm
    Permalink

    What’s in those god damned tax return statements???

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:03 am
    Permalink

    Trump is blatantly doing everything illegal to inundate the legal processes to impeach a president. This has been their tactic from the beginning… them being bullies and narcissistically greedy. The entire GOP is complicit in conspiracy to maintain power no expense spared. Trump is the GOP patsy.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:06 am
    Permalink

    Don’t listen to the ney sayers and just pass the vote to get Trump out of office for the good of the country

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:12 am
    Permalink

    Nadler babbling…innuendo…bringing up odd info.Get real work done BOZO ! Your tactic$ are obviou$ and dumb. None hiding anything…..

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:13 am
    Permalink

    We need to start impeachment on this president.  Stop wasting time and our taxes investigating articles of impeachment.  How much does this president have to do before you actually recommend "articles of impeachment"?  How many poor people are sitting in jail for very minor crimes.  Come on Democrats get your act together and get moving.  Time is passing.  This country and the world cannot afford another 4 years of this president.  Our democracy, our economy and our reputation with our allies is in serious jeopardy.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:27 am
    Permalink

    like a car chase in L.A ?just trying 2 enjoy the most see the most do the most? the more you listen same words over&over "BRAINWASHED" by dictator DIVIDE & CONQUER ordered trump or "R?????" ordered him.???

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:36 am
    Permalink

    chump cant b in office more than 8yrs by that time MEXICO will have our land back usa will b 1more bankruptcy 2 chump's many this time MEXICO takes women only PILGRIMS

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:58 am
    Permalink

    Lock up that trumpturd and his greedy family,he sooo should be impeached!!!!!No one in history has been as crooked as him!😣😵💨💩

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:07 am
    Permalink

    He could shoot someone on national TV and get away with it,Rep's will protect him nomatter what,they have sold their sole's to the Devil ,Most of them ,Mascow Mitch for sure!😣😵💨💩

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:13 am
    Permalink

    This is very important. The committee needs this information, ALL INFORMATION possible. This administration is hopes that the Democrats will go for impeachment only with public information. That is very telling that they are hiding a larger secret. Perhaps a secret so explosive that it will turn the base against Trump

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:27 am
    Permalink

    Can't conclude what you don't have, there is every reason why you can't go any farther.Majority of Americans do not want impeachment.You are against the will of the people.Your conclusion should represent the will of America,no less than a Coup Datt'a, Treason.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:28 am
    Permalink

    You're blowing smoke Up your own A_sets.Dumbocrat

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:35 am
    Permalink

    You are in contempt, you need to be investigated not our President,Coup Datt'a is Treason. By Military Tribunal.Don't bet you are not untouchable.We pursuit U

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:36 am
    Permalink

    full marks for creative corruption

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:42 am
    Permalink

    THE INBRED, UNEDUCATED…BRAINWASHED TRUMP CULT FOLLOWERS HAVE NO IDEA THAT BY FALLING FOR RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA ON FACEBOOK THEY HAVE DESTROYED OUR DEMOCRACY. Long after trump is gone….the damage he has done can not be undone. Unless he is sent to prison for a long time or better still shot for treason….every POTUS to follow will know they can defy congress & get away with it. Our president is now king & what our founding fathers fought against we are back to.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:27 am
    Permalink

    Muh Russiar

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:46 am
    Permalink

    Regardless of what additional dirty unconstitutional actions this most corrupt administration will try to prevent the truth from coming out full, we will be removing them and their ring leader in the 2020 elections.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:53 am
    Permalink

    Well mr Nadler you have wasted thousands chasing your tail the American people have no choice but to let you go yes Jerry you are fired you work for us we pay you, clean your desk out. Good luck

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:55 am
    Permalink

    Illicit-45 has shown our country just how much are US Constitution must be amended to prevent the likes of him, and his cronies, from ever being an elected public official again.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:55 am
    Permalink

    I like how all the comments are complaining about the law being violates. Ummmmm sanctuary cities by law is illegal, but it's allowed to happen. When feds threaten to cut funding for these cities. They sued in the 9th circuit of course. Stating it's unconstitutional when their flagrantly breaking the law.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:57 am
    Permalink

    At first I blamed only voters for the Trump travesty for not researching him before they voted for him or voting for him anyway knowing his conduct was known to be shady. But Trump is who he is, and now I blame only the members of the Senate who continue to aid and abet his lawlessness in order to keep their party in power rather than serving the best interests of the people.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
    Permalink

    He didn't direct the military to go stay there are military wants to stay there these people want to stay in this Motel I'll bet you want to stay there too don't you you f**** idiots we've never had a president that owned half the United States and hotels all over the world and you guys got to try to f*** it up somehow he's not making any money off this s*** you f**** losers he gave up billions to be are f**** president we could get lied about by you motherfukers you and your Russia b***** impeach the president for this and that you guys are such losers you were going to lose again so big and you're going to look so stupid I can't wait

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 3:25 am
    Permalink

    Two years of We Have The Proof !! Russian Collusion !! , preceded by Trump Has Zero Xhance Of Becoming President . 2020 , going to be a flood of liberal tears . Oh boy .

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 3:42 am
    Permalink

    This is going to blow up in the Dems face in spectacular fashion. Nadler may get himself re-elected, but he is going to get Trump re-elected, too. If the goal is to simply have an impeachment vote, he better do it before the latest IG report is released to the public, and before Flynn's case is thrown out.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 3:50 am
    Permalink

    get on with it the longer trump is president the worse america will suffer

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 3:52 am
    Permalink

    Trump! Trump! Trump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:05 am
    Permalink

    Enough of this impeachment gimmicks. Impeachment is not going to happen.
    Nadler and the rest of Democratic leaders are acting as if Trump and his AG have something on them.
    Rather than give up the charades they engage in all manner of semantics, and flourishes which makes it look like they are actually doing something. These kinds of behavior is what made Americans tune off Congress. At least we now know they have no powers at all, so they just get paid and paid again by lobbyists.

    The broadcast only serves the cable news industry who must air something to maintain their contracts with advertisers.
    Nadler hasn't prepared for any of these interviews in over a year he has just been repeating the same lines minus the edition to accommodate new dates when the same documents are re-filed in court.
    The only work here is done at the Clerks office who must change the dates on the inbox stamp.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:19 am
    Permalink

    SDNY… INDICT 45 IN 2019

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:31 am
    Permalink

    They don't have the super vote 48-52 in the house the republicans control that, so this is a waste of time, a witch hunt.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:33 am
    Permalink

    U all Smokin Bath Salts.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:35 am
    Permalink

    To try to uncover evidence, even if we have to produce it, unverified, f it, any cost any way, and hahah u still lose, losers.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:38 am
    Permalink

    U have no power u little nancy.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 4:59 am
    Permalink

    I feel like only a few Dems are fighting to change this system. The majority want to meet in the middle of dysfunction with the Repub. we’re watching the corporations who fund these elected officials decide action not the Americans!! When Castro said we were living in a delusion & we were not a democracy he was right. We have the controlling interests using gov to give us options of their choosing and the saying we have a freedom of choice! It’s like asking water or milk? Vs what would you like to drink. The US is water or milk? China, Russia & North Korea, Iran etc. are the just water group. Wake up Americans!! Freedom is not regulated by companies or gov!! Both parties are dancing to different songs of the same artist!

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 5:09 am
    Permalink

    IMPORT MORE MEXICANS FOR SLAVE LABOR vote DemoKKKrat 2020!

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 5:10 am
    Permalink

    Nadler is a bumbling communist who once spoke about how he would do anything to destroy the USA.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 5:13 am
    Permalink

    IN the Impeachment he said Trump colluded with the russians then said He didn't.. He's just a religious cult leader.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 5:14 am
    Permalink

    Secret Soviet courts Nadler doesn't want the public to see it's all Theater. They never had anything on Trump.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 5:36 am
    Permalink

    Oh..another investigation. (((yaaaaaawn…from Europe))))

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 5:54 am
    Permalink

    Barr is Trump's most dangerous fixer.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 6:16 am
    Permalink

    DESTRUCTION OF JUSTICE Barr is a Fkn CRIMINAL and WILL BE brought to REAL JUSTICE !

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 6:49 am
    Permalink

    Impeach trump and his loyalists. We have proof he lies. Barr is a trump fixer. We deserve an honest government.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 7:47 am
    Permalink

    How easily democracy becomes a dictatorship

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 7:53 am
    Permalink

    GOP = going outlaw punks

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 8:12 am
    Permalink

    Man! Willim Lowering the Barr certainly is persistent at Lowering the BARR. WHAT association does he belong to? Must be a bird lover. Because there are Swallows all over the place.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 9:27 am
    Permalink

    What a joke, good luck you imbeciles.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 9:41 am
    Permalink

    Trump will be the first President to go from The White House to The Big House.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 11:25 am
    Permalink

    Is there anyone left in the country that still doubts that trump is in effect king and emperor of America? He has installed his lackey to head the ( what used to be ) the justice department. Now he has what he's always wanted, his own roy Cohn. Get ready for the trump second administration. He with help from Moscow Mitch will steal yet another election. And there is nothing anyone can do about it. All hail king trump.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:29 pm
    Permalink

    Plain and simple VOTE tRump out!

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:55 pm
    Permalink

    Democrats move any slower Trump will die of old age before democrats start true investigations.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 12:58 pm
    Permalink

    Is trump paying nancy and Nadler off because it sure seems like it

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:10 pm
    Permalink

    No doubt Democrats are stupid. This tactic is almost 3 years in and Trump is only getting stronger. Go ahead Democraps Trump will destroy you. Did any of you morons see the new wall, its beautiful.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:23 pm
    Permalink

    Barr was a criminal during the iran- Contra Affair; using Ollie North as the fall guy, advising Reagan to answer 'I don't recall' to everything' (strange irony), then advised Bush Sr to pardon everyone before the evidence and witnesses made it up the chain to him. Barr should be impeached too.and evidence from then to now on his crimes against America as well as his acts of complicity in covering up crimes, and obstruction of justice.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:47 pm
    Permalink

    IMPEACH FOR WHAT?

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:51 pm
    Permalink

    Blah blah blah…
    Typical Democratic cowardice.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 1:56 pm
    Permalink

    I'm beginning to think tRump, the Senate and the DOJ are castrating our great Republic and have begun the process of dismantling our government into some form of dictatorship. 40 per cent of Americans love it. Wow.

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:06 pm
    Permalink

    nadler why we need term limits

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:07 pm
    Permalink

    what nonsense

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:08 pm
    Permalink

    As much crimes and laws this president breaks part of this country people still supports him says a lot about this country

    Reply
  • September 16, 2019 at 2:09 pm
    Permalink

    Hopefully this is the last year of this garbage before Trump wins again and we can move on…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *